havent you morons ever seen i didnt know i was pregnant. not all woman show!!! and ere 1 who says shes lucky to b small no she aint, baby belly's are the best things ever!!! congrats girl
U look very pretty! And it is possible to be this tiny. I am 32 weeks n i look like her n Yes!!! Im having a baby.. Everyones body is different!!!
GOD BLESS YA'LL
she is carrying the baby in her back.. hello.. OMG... debating why her belly is sdmall.. shes lucky.... one day itll just pop out.. trust me thats how mines was with my second. i didnt shoe til eight months
sry I am 32 weeks and I have a uterus that is so far back my Dr. said I must have standed on my head to get pregnant and Everyone says I am small but I am not that small its not even round it looks like shes pushing her stomach out real preg women dont have to hold there breath and clentch there teeth to look preg it comes natural but nice try lol
If she is pregnant; she's lucky and if she isn't; oh well who cares? lol
posted 5th Jun
BG (: wrote: WHO GIVES A SHIT?!?!?!? honestly there are over 30 comments just of people bitching that she supposedly isn't pregnant or the baby is too small..is it seriously that big of a deal to you? jeez, get over it.
alls i no is that theres gotta be sumthin wrong cuz im deffinatly alot bigger then that and they are still yellin at me sayin im to small and my baby is the size of a 30week baby so i no ur either in the wrong week or theres sumthin really wrong
posted 27th Apr
Maria.chicas wrote: Hmm correct me if im wrong but sweetie are you tucking in your stomach are you seriously 32 wks im almost there and sure as heck aint that small
Jilly280 wrote: I have a friend that is 33 weeks preg and she looks like she is 4months preg. She is very skinny. Somepeople that are very skinny will not show untill they are abotu 8months preg.
a lady in my church was this size and this small and she even was smaller farther along. It was crazy, I kept askin her if she was really prego and she popped out a baby in december, full term 7 lb baby. She just carried it really weird and hardly showed the WHOLE time. Its possible. its also possible it was put in the wrong category too.
ok I weighed 94 pounds before I got bregnant and Im not even that small. Somethin isnt right here.
posted 11th Dec '08
hmmmm, call me stupid all u want, but n about 6 more weeks shes supposed 2 deliver a full term baby? sure mayb its great dat shes not huge, but i think mayb she should b showin a lil more den dat... im jus sayin.
you guys are stupid,
there are tons of ladys that dont show at all!
and then the ones that dont even know that they are pregnant, how do you think that is,
babygirl wrote: well i was watching this show on tv about this lady she was pregnant and her belly was as small as hers and later they found out her baby was a dwarf came out less then 9inches also they had to give her emergency c-section cause something was wrong so who knows maybe it has health problem or other then that the picture is in the wrong place
mommy2bw#2 wrote: I'm sorry people,but you can't be indenial! Either this is a mistake or something isn't right.I don't have to sit here and compare her to my mother's cousin's sister's friend to know she shouldn't be that little this close to term.32 weeks? I don't think so...5 months or something I could even understand,but there just isn't any room in there for a nearly 4 pound baby.It is physically impossible.I dont care if she is "sucking it in" or the baby is towards her back or whatever...That is not a 32 week picture.Obviously it's a mistake or a very small,sick baby!
posted 18th Mar '08
letitia wrote: wow is there room in there for a baby
posted 4th Mar '08
kat wrote: wow your really tiny
posted 28th Feb '08
Angie_mercer_95 wrote: Okay obviously you all are just plain stupid.. there's many thing that could be going on with this chick she could be sucking it in hey I did and it worked for five months and no one had a clue..
or her baby could be small or maybe its just the way the baby's positioned cause some time when I lay on my back my belly goes flat... as if I wasn't pregnant but there's no denying that... so girls there is a way...
Wow are you sure your 32 weeks or maybe didnt put the picture in the wrong place because I am 32 weeks and I look like I am carrying a basketball
posted 25th Nov '07
jrp wrote: yeah, it was obviously put in the wrong week section. There's no way for her to have a 17" baby and not be showing at all... yeah, SOME people can not show *much* this far along, but not when you are that tiny to begin with
okay, normally i am a defender of women when people say they look "too small" but i'm sorry, you can't deny that there could be somethin up.... 32 weeks?!!? c'mon, in 8 more weeks we will have a full term baby!!!! I wouldn't be saying this if there was a small bump or if she was a "bigger" girl but she isn't... she is small. I honestly think it's just a mess up and she's in the wrong week.
posted 1st Nov '07
Angie cummings wrote: You look good!!! It is possible to carry babies this way. Haven't you people ever heard of carrying the baby in someones back. Just because she looks better than you doesn't mean you should put herdown.
posted 30th Oct '07
suleyka wrote: i hate when people are saying: are u sure your _ months pregnant? helloooo everybody if she put her picture there is because she is 32 weeks.. i dont have a chance to put my picture here because is on maintaince and maybe take for ever but if everybody see me is going to be hard to believe im 32 weeks.. and i eat healthy... some people are small others are bigger...everybody is different... she looks cute and the baby is over there.. she dont need a big belly... lucky her!
There is no way that is a 32 week belly! This has got to be in the wrong spot. Maybe 3 week belly?!
posted 11th Oct '07
Ashley wrote: That's not healthy!
posted 21st Sep '07
sarah wrote: are you shure that you are not like five weeks preg? maybe you have this in the wrong spot. im just wonderin cuz you usualy see a bigger bump
posted 17th Sep '07
Tanisha wrote: wow I hope this is just put in the wrong place but if its not and you are 32 weeks you look beautiful I just don't know where that baby is hiding
posted 29th Aug '07
Ami wrote: Yeah, I think this was put in the wrong place....there's no way!
GOD BLESS YA'LL
WHO GIVES A SHIT?!?!?!? honestly there are over 30 comments just of people bitching that she supposedly isn't pregnant or the baby is too small..is it seriously that big of a deal to you? jeez, get over it.
Hmm correct me if im wrong but sweetie are you tucking in your stomach are you seriously 32 wks im almost there and sure as heck aint that small
I have a friend that is 33 weeks preg and she looks like she is 4months preg. She is very skinny. Somepeople that are very skinny will not show untill they are abotu 8months preg.
there are tons of ladys that dont show at all!
and then the ones that dont even know that they are pregnant, how do you think that is,
i think she looks great.
well i was watching this show on tv about this lady she was pregnant and her belly was as small as hers and later they found out her baby was a dwarf came out less then 9inches also they had to give her emergency c-section cause something was wrong so who knows maybe it has health problem or other then that the picture is in the wrong place
I'm sorry people,but you can't be indenial! Either this is a mistake or something isn't right.I don't have to sit here and compare her to my mother's cousin's sister's friend to know she shouldn't be that little this close to term.32 weeks? I don't think so...5 months or something I could even understand,but there just isn't any room in there for a nearly 4 pound baby.It is physically impossible.I dont care if she is "sucking it in" or the baby is towards her back or whatever...That is not a 32 week picture.Obviously it's a mistake or a very small,sick baby!
wow is there room in there for a baby
wow your really tiny
Okay obviously you all are just plain stupid.. there's many thing that could be going on with this chick she could be sucking it in hey I did and it worked for five months and no one had a clue..
or her baby could be small or maybe its just the way the baby's positioned cause some time when I lay on my back my belly goes flat... as if I wasn't pregnant but there's no denying that... so girls there is a way...
yeah, it was obviously put in the wrong week section. There's no way for her to have a 17" baby and not be showing at all... yeah, SOME people can not show *much* this far along, but not when you are that tiny to begin with
You look good!!! It is possible to carry babies this way. Haven't you people ever heard of carrying the baby in someones back. Just because she looks better than you doesn't mean you should put herdown.
i hate when people are saying: are u sure your _ months pregnant? helloooo everybody if she put her picture there is because she is 32 weeks.. i dont have a chance to put my picture here because is on maintaince and maybe take for ever but if everybody see me is going to be hard to believe im 32 weeks.. and i eat healthy... some people are small others are bigger...everybody is different... she looks cute and the baby is over there.. she dont need a big belly... lucky her!
That's not healthy!
are you shure that you are not like five weeks preg? maybe you have this in the wrong spot. im just wonderin cuz you usualy see a bigger bump
wow I hope this is just put in the wrong place but if its not and you are 32 weeks you look beautiful I just don't know where that baby is hiding
Yeah, I think this was put in the wrong place....there's no way!
you sure you are in week 32?where is your baby then(it weights about 2kg!!)????