Pregnancy Week 32 Calendar Girl (1 of 91)

maggy wrote:
I think some people are jealous...it is a beautiful pic. I have found that the people who make snide comments are the ones who have low self esteem and only wish they could do things like this. gorgeous!!

I personally think you look absolutely stunning. The picture ISN'T graphic, it's actually TASTEFUL and ARTISTIC!

Chelsea wrote:
Honestly, alot of the comments are about what the child will think in the future. Let me tell you, at 33 weeks with my second child, there is nothing more that my 4 year old daughter like than to see me naked with her beautiful sister growing inside my tummy. She comments everyday how much my belly is growing. The impression of the child isn't the isssue, I think that we as adults have tried to place our knowledge of perversion onto the innocence of a child. If it isn't for you, then don't do pictures like this, but this mom looks great and hats off to her being confortable in her own skin!

NO STRETCHMARKS wrote:
I'm on the fence about this one...I think she's BEAUTIFUL...and the photography is amazing, GREAT use of shadow-but i also think that it takes a PROUD woman to post something like this...though-I PERSONALLY wouldn't want a pic like this of me, cause well..i'm HUGE-but no stretchmarks! i say-LET HER BE-she's GORGEOUS!

I don't understand why people post negative things about any of these photos. It is really sad that people can't accept others and the way the are/choose to express themselves. Praise the ones you like and click "next" if you don't without commenting on it. the negativity is extremely juvenile.

Angie wrote:
I absolutly love your pic! My husband has taken some pics like this for me. We didnt want to go actually have them done because of the way I wanted them so he did them. We set it up really nice with the lighting and everything. There are just for me and him and our photo books! BUT I SO LOVE THIS!! Beautiful!

Kelly wrote:
I am much bigger than this girl and I DON"T HAVE STRETCH MARKS, and I started off with NO BELLY at all.. so get over it.. most woman DO NOT get Stretch Marks.. and I think she looks great, I wish I was this brave!

Cher wrote:
Wow..women are vicious!
She looks great!..it's her perogative if she feels to take a nude pic..She has the body,flaunt it girl! U look hott!
It's still tasteful-looking

kat wrote:
THAT IS A GORGEOUS PICTURE..YOU LOOK BEAUTIFUL

Angie_mercer_95 wrote:
People grow up
this chicks Beautiful..
obviously you wish you could
look as good as this.. this
isn't a porno site it a site
for woman..

H.Y. wrote:
Um.. yeah, put some cloths on. Lots of women taking this kind of pictures doesn't mean it look nice. In this picture it doesn't seem/feel that you are taking a "Prego Belly Shot".

You look beautiful and to sara below me plenty of women take these kind of photos. its beautiful and it shows the pregnant womens curves with her special baby still inside...

I think this picture is absolutely beautiful, its not meant to be sexual in anyway, you are showing you are feminine and still sexy woman, you can still be a wonderful mother and sexy too, I'm 30+ weeks and I wish I looked as amazing as you! If your baby looks anything like you, he/she is going to be gorgeous!

tara wrote:
good on you, i wish i looked so radiant and relaxed and beautiful. this is my 32nd week aswell, and im looking and feeling quite bloated and chubby, so i really do envy you. and what a lovely keepsake to have when you're much older and can look back and say, 'damn i looked good!'

i think you are absolutly beautiful this picture is amazing and the ones who think you need to put clothes on are the ones who are thinking perverted this is beautiful art not grotesq
people need to back off there is something called freedom and she is not doing any indecent exposer what so ever

this photo is breathtaking... im sure if it were considered indecent... the moderators would not have POSTED IT... so all you grammas and "pinched" so called LADIES need to just leave her alone... she is covering everything that needs to be covered... and her photo is ART.... if it were wrong to be nude god would have made us all be born with clothes on.... or at least a fig leaf.... there is nothing wrong with showing the proof and glory of creation... so all you old ladies can STICK IT
:D

4evrhiz wrote:
I think you look great. I am 31 weeks and i don't have any stretch marks and i am not real big either. A triangle bikini would cover about as much skin....so people please grow up!

Loren wrote:
I love this picture, I am plus size and can still appriciate BEAUTY. . . what an awesome, FIT body. . . I think the pic is very artsy and BEAUTIFUL! All she is showing is part of her boob. . . what's so bad about that, I think that the picture seems a bit dark but had there been a white back ground her her smiling while standing up everyone would have been much nicer. . . YOU LOOK AMAZING!!

lizjtx wrote:
You look GREAT! I wouldn't pay any attention to these rude women saying your pic is tasteless. It's not as if you're showing anything important. (I think we've all seen a little side boob, have we not ladies?) Also, wonderful job with the photography, the lighting couldn't show off your gorgeous bumb any better! Congrats!

sarah wrote:
I think this photo is beautiful and taken in a tasteful manner. If Demi Moore can do it why cant other pregnant women.

srm8824 wrote:
lovely picture...

Amanda wrote:
I agree that this photo was taken in good taste. The human body is nothing to be ashamed of and pregnancy is such a beautiful thing. All private parts are covered and its not much differant than seeing the pictures of the ladys on here in bikinis IMO as you dont see anything with the shading.Dont mind what others say, I was taught when U was young if you dont have anything nice to say than you dont say anything at all apparentley some of these ladies have lost that along the way.

karina wrote:
Stop hating Sara..... You look really good Rayda!

irina wrote:
I love this photo... Although I wouldn't necessarily consider it a "work of art", it is by no mean tasteless, as some posters suggested. Rayda, don't pay attention to negative comments (these are the same people who probably walk through the Louvre with their eyes closed... "OMG!! I'm surrounded with peepee's and titties!!") You look beautiful!

You look absolutely gorgeous in this photo. For all of those that are leaving negative comments they are just jealous. I dont think you are showing too much at all because everything inappropriate is covered by either her hand or shadow, and I agree not ALL women get stretchmarks and btw this picture looks like it was taken professionally so they could touched up her stretchmarks. Stop being so hard on her! She looks great!

melissa wrote:
im so surprised at all the negative comments people are writing about this picture. i am between 32/33 weeks with my first (its a boy!!!) and just this past weekend i had pregnancy pictures of me taken similar to this one. im mostly a modest person, but it was so fun to show off my pregnant body! its amazing how many people are digusted by pregnancy. more power to you, and this picture! its beautiful! clearly the people at baby-gaga thought so too, or they wouldnt have put it up! :o)

deborahlouise wrote:
Dang! I can honestly say I'm shocked by some of the comments. Everyone on here should know how emotional you are when your pregnant, especially about your own body, so why would you put someone else down ~ no matter how you feel about the picture, this website is here to celebrate the beauty of pregnancy, and support each other on the journey - everyone who made a negative comment about someone else should be ashamed. I think that if this is how you want to express your pregnancy, then go for it! Your beautiful Rayda.

ContenuNocif wrote:
This photo is absolutely gorgeous!

Ashley*Renee wrote:
Ok, so I didnt finish reading everyones comments but all I know is the first few people who left comments on here need to grow up. Like others on here have said, the human body is a beautiful thing and not something to be ashamed of. You didnt show too much and you DID do it in a tasteful way. I think you look amazing girl! Very beautiful

renee23 wrote:
this pic is absolutly gorgous!!!!!! i am also in my 32 week with my second its a girl! for those girlss haten GROW UP!!! you wish you looked good enough to take a pic like this one!! oh and im 32 weeks second child and i have NO strechmarks at all and ive gained 40 lbs so far!! some of us are just blessed!!

wait, how can u tell if she's not wearing undies? And who cares? I think the ones saying to put clothes on are jealous they dont look this good...they're probably also the ones who wont breast feed because they think breast are a sexual and not nurturing body part. This is a BEAUTIFUL pic. Its one of my favs on here. How can you be so critical of the human body? Grow up....

ms.pontes wrote:
I have no prob with this pic.... to each their own... some people just love hatin that's all... can't please everyone. Congrats.

Stephanie wrote:
Congrats on getting the most comments.

Sharawnda wrote:
Hot crowd, hot crowd...I think if the people who run this site allowed her to post her picture, then it couldn't POSSIBLY be that offensive. Yes, she is nude, but she's not showing anything that you'd normally see on a naked body. I think it takes guts to allow someone to photograph you in such a fragile state as pregnancy, and I think she should be proud of how the picture turned out. If you have a problem with the picture, then DON'T LOOK AT IT!

To be honest, I wouldn't MYSELF post a pic like this, cause my boyfriend would flip, and I wanna keep some things private for him only. But I'm sure this woman was simply trying to show the beauty of pregnancy, not simply "show off" because her face is mostly unrecognizable.

rideswithchrist wrote:
I think that is it a beautiful picture...but maybe for her husband's eyes. I am going to bless my husband with a photo like this, but he will be the only one who sees it. It is very pretty, I like the lighting- I just don't see it as a public photo- but by all means, every woman on here should give a photo like this to their hubby! After all- he is the one that loves your nakedness so.

poorxangel wrote:
I don't think it is appropriate either. I sure wouldn't want to show something like that to my baby, no matter how I looked. I'm sitting here looking at all these pictures of beautiful women who can show off their wonderful pregnant bodies with decency and then comes one in her underwear or, like this one, completely nude. It's embarrassing to me, especially if my children are nearby. This is not the type of thing I want them to see. I don't see why everyone keeps bringing up stretch marks, that has nothing to do with the general feeling of inappropriateness...it's that the only thing she has covering herself is her hand. As for it being a thing of "art", remember, art is in the eye of the beholder and not everyone considers nudity to be art.

I can't even believe HATERS hate on such beautiful thing! She's not showing her vagina or butt or anything, even if she was showing it it would be a very innocent picture, it's a celebration of a beatiful gift. I can't believe people sometimes - They must be fat and overweight and SUPER JEALOUS of a beautiful woman like her! She's pretty and I WISH i had that body right now. Anyways, who cares about what others think, u can never make everyone happy. :)

This is a beautiful pic! You cannot see anything bad so what's the big deal?? I think those women are just jealous honey because you look georgeous. I wish i didnt have any stretch marks lol :P GOOD LUCK!

JessicaS wrote:
I love this picture. I wish I could take one just like it. It is very tasteful, and like others said, your child will be amazed that you looked so beautiful when pregnant! Good for you! It looks like art.

kristenmarie913 wrote:
THIS IS A BEAUTIFUL PICTURE AND IT IS NOT AT ALL TASTELESS
THESE WOMEN MUST JUST WISH THEY LOOKED THAT GOOD WHILE THEY WERE PREGNANT, NOT EVERYONE CAN BE AS LUCKY AS US!

I think you look beautiful and this picture captures the beauty and sensuality of pregnancy. I also have no stretch marks and Im on my second pregnancy. People need to stop being so uptight theres nothing wrong with being sexual..afterall if it werent for sex..thered be no pregnancy at all. You look great honey!!! =)

mama_flick wrote:
nuts to those cats knockin you! youre beautiful and so is this picture! i'm 32 weeks too and though i also dont have stretch marks (thank god) i would love to have your upper belly muscle tone.

to all of you that are calling this inapropriate: Grow up. Honestly, if I didn't have stretch marks I'd be all over this type of picture! You look great, you're not showing your 'goods' (Everything is covered up ladies) Power to you for having the confidence to do this!

empressmommie wrote:
I wish we could see the cute baby belly more than the breast!!!

Seda Shook wrote:
Wow! Who took the picture. You look gorgeous. I would blow this up and put in my bedroom. My husband would love a picture of me like this.

Brittany wrote:
You are absolutely beautiful. and this picture is amazing. I disagree with the other comments stating that it is "inapropriate"

and congrats....

KaiLei wrote:
NOT ALL WOMEN HAVE STRETCH MARKS!! AND I AGREE THESE WOMEN SOUND BIG AND BITTER!! THERE IS NO MODEL SIZE WHEN IT COMES TO BEING PREGNANT!! I DONT SEE WHATS TO AWFULL ABOUT THIS PICTURE. IN MY OPINION ITS NATURAL BEAUTY!! SOME OF YOU GUYS ARE ACTING LIKE SHES BENT OVER IN A COMPROMISING POSITION!! MY POINT IS SHE LOOKS GREAT AND SOME OF YOU WISH YOU COULD POSE LIKE THIS..LAY OFF THE TEA CAKES AND STAY OFF THE COMPUTER AND TAKE A WALK!!

Ashley wrote:
I think you look absolutely stunning in this picture, it looks like you had a fit body before and will continue throughout your pregnancy! These ladies seem a lil' bitter towards you, but keep on keepin on you look great!

Julie wrote:
I agree with the 2 above me! I think this is a georgeous picture and is very tasteful in every aspect of the word. Being naked is natural, you all that told her to put some clothes on need to GROW UP! This site is for woman, you act like you've never seen another woman naked before! Ya'll act like she has her legs wide open or something....jjjjjjjjeeeeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzz!

jessica_stone61 wrote:
Im guessing most of you ladies never were in any sort of Art History class. The human body is art and is a temple and he in no way is portraying anything pornographic or disgusting she is beautiful and pregnancy is beautiful embrace it and stop being rude to her because your jealous you dont have the guts to show your bodies like this!! You look great honey keep it up :)

lilrie wrote:
I think there is nothing wrong with this photo. It is very beautiful and natural. It really is a good piece of art. I believe it was done in a tasteful way, you can't see anything that is a private part, everything is covered, you can barely see her face, it's mostly concentrating on the belly. Good use of shadow. I think it would be a good piece to have as a piece of artwork b/c that's what having a child is....beautiful. And for the stretchmarks? I'm freakin huge for 32 weeks and have no stretch marks on my belly either. But that doesn't mean I should hide my belly right?

danielle meeks wrote:
Wow!! I just found out I am pregnant with my third baby. Congrats!! You are absolutely stunning. gorgeous. Perfect. I would love to look so beautiful pregnant and I would be proud to show that pic to my children. Children unlike the weirdos on here are not perverted..they are innocent and therefore would think upon seeing this that they are proud to have a mom who takes such great care of her health while pregnant and otherwise. Thanks for sharing your beauty

aunt_annie wrote:
I'm sure she is not interested in everyone's views on photography during pregnancy or otherwise. Rayda, you look beautiful! Congrats!

Danelle wrote:
I find this something you wouldn't want to show your child when he/she gets older. How sad....Your child would have loved to see mommy with clothes ON. I'm sure they would be so uncomfortable looking at this, they rather not even see it. This should be in a different calendar. Like one for MEN!

stretch marks wrote:
yes I know that not all women get stretch marks, but honestly most of us do... again this picture is not my cup of tea. Love Bev

Tasia Nicole wrote:
I'm 50/50 on this picture. It's very beautiful to show off your pregnancy (esp if you don't already have stretch marks). I doubt the daddy to my baby would allow me to show off that much on a website, but more power to you for doing it.

ellijaymom wrote:
I think it is a beautiful photo. In my opinion she looks pregnant. Not everyone gets stretch marks.

stretch marks wrote:
i'm not sure if your pregnant, I don't see any stretch marks, and hunny please put some clothes on. Love Bev

kaltiz01 wrote:
Yea I kinda agree. Pregnancy photography can be beautiful but not in a tasteless way. Very pretty girl but a little modesty wouldnt hurt